Doctors v insurers: When did the fight start?

SINGAPORE - A group of private sector doctors has taken issue with what it calls "highly exclusive" panels of doctors, approved by Integrated Shield Plan (IP) insurers, in a bid to counter their rising costs. The specialists blame insurers for creating plans that led to excessive claims and excluding too many doctors from their panels, while insurers blame doctors for overcharging and over-treatment. Please subscribe or log in to continue reading the full article. Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month Latest headlines and exclusive stories In-depth analyses and award-winning multimedia content Get access to all with our no-contract promotional package at only $0.99/month for the first 3 months* Subscribe now *Terms and conditions apply.

Having more doctors on IP panels may lead to higher premiums: Life Insurance Association

SINGAPORE - Having more doctors on the panels of Integrated Shield Plans is on the cards but they cannot expect default fees at the upper end of fee benchmarks set by the Ministry of Health (MOH), as this may lead to higher claim costs and consequently, premiums, said the Life Insurance Association (LIA) Singapore on Friday (April 2). In its second response to a position statement on IPs released by the Singapore Medical Association (SMA) nearly a week ago, LIA Singapore reiterated the link between an increased number of doctors and higher claims. "If insurers recklessly increase panels, premiums will rise significantly, but if we increase the panel sizes in a careful manner, while paying the doctors reasonable fees, then the impact on premiums can be muted," said a spokesman from LIA Singapore. The SMA has expressed unhappiness at the limited number of private specialists on IP panels, and the fact that they are mostly paid at the lower end of the fee benchmarks. SMA argues that their costs are rising because of greater management expenses and commission costs for insurers, rather than higher claims. LIA Singapore's point is that insurers' costs went up in the short term, but this...

askST: Will I be affected by the ongoing battle between doctors and IP insurers?

SINGAPORE - Doctors and Integrated Shield Plan (IP) insurers are currently locked in a battle over the relatively small number of preferred private specialists on the insurers' panels. The rift is not new but it intensified at the start of the week when the Singapore Medical Association (SMA), which has more than 8,200 members, issued a position statement on what it called "troubled" IPs. Please subscribe or log in to continue reading the full article. Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month Latest headlines and exclusive stories In-depth analyses and award-winning multimedia content Get access to all with our no-contract promotional package at only $0.99/month for the first 3 months* Subscribe now *Terms and conditions apply.

Insurance: Pay more if you see your own doctors

Unless you are prepared to pay more, the days of consulting private doctors who are not on your insurers' panels for hospital treatment will soon be over for most people. Instead of just making co-payment compulsory in new "riders", which are add-on policies to the main private medical plans, the six major insurers - AIA, Aviva, AXA, Great Eastern, Income and Prudential - want customers to seek treatment with their accredited specialists or doctors at public hospitals. Please subscribe or log in to continue reading the full article. Get unlimited access to all stories at $0.99/month Latest headlines and exclusive stories In-depth analyses and award-winning multimedia content Get access to all with our no-contract promotional package at only $0.99/month for the first 3 months* Subscribe now *Terms and conditions apply.